Unseen if not uncaring March 17, 2013
You have to wonder about her poetry and what it actually
means, and how they are shaped with craft enough to be taken on a number of
levels with multiple meanings, sometimes including odd bits such as that schizophrenia
poem a few months ago that seems to take a cheap shot at me, or even those
poems over the summer couched in apparent kindness – such as the quicksand poem,
when perhaps they aren’t kind at all.
Some of her poems barely control her rage, although most
poems struggle not to reveal the near despair she clearly sometimes feels.
At the same time, it is easy to read things into her poems
that might not be there, or perhaps she did not intend, the unconscious
revelations all writers display unintentionally, aspects of the creative
process we must rely on, but sometimes can betray our honest feelings, when we
never intended to.
It is dangerous, however, to look for clues in her poems or
to presume messages that are not there, such as might be the case with her former
boss from Brooklyn.
Such is the path of folly.
We all misinterpret even when we have the best of intentions
not to, such as when she misinterpreted by intentions last September when I
tried to set up that meeting between her and the Neighboring Mayor in an
attempt to broker peace. She mistakenly assumed my motives were to see her privately.
I have since assumed that time would dissipate this paranoia
and have done my best to avoid any kind of contact since (or in the future), I
suspect she still thinks I do.
I also have to avoid falling into my own kind of paranoia,
avoid thinking she might be baiting traps for me in an effort to expose me, and
why I study her poems to find a meaning that has nothing to do with me – yet,
at the same time, reals something about her character that I might better
understand what it is she is going through.
Even to assume who is it she is writing a poem about is dangerous
business – since the further we get from the summer the less likely anything
she writes is even remotely directed at me, although at the same time, I assume
she must know I read these poems, just as her Brooklyn man does, and perhaps
others who she has left behind in the dust.
The poem about her stealing intangible things could be
written about anyone, but it also reflects this problem of reading into things
that may or may not be there, as she reads people’s smiles and looks to reflect
her own desires, inadvertently becoming the clever and cunning imp she implied
I was last September, and ultimately setting herself up for disappointment – or
perhaps major heart break. Those things may indeed be there for her to read but
may be – as those unconscious things in her poems – unconscious revelations from
someone who has no intention of acting on them, love affair in the mind that
remains pure if it is contained, and her forcing these into the light may well create
an unintended tragedy for him and for her.
For me, this is a kind of sad voyeurism, like watching what
I know will be a train wreck, and yet have no way of stopping it – even if I
should.
In the end, we all make our own choices, and live with the
consequences of them, and I suspect that at the end of this, when after the
trains collide, she will be posting particularly painful poems that I will also
read, unseen, if not uncaring.
Comments
Post a Comment