All boys or all girls? May 9, 2013
It’s amazing. In the space of six months, our staff has gone
from all women and one man (the man being me) to all men and one woman, and
since the boss does all the hiring, you have to wonder if this was intentional.
The boss, who has been out on two maternity leaves, has manipulated
behind the scenes to keep her position during the first one, and sabotaged her
temporary replacement during the second.
This boss also seems to be aware of our male owner’s
relationship with our former female reporter (the poet) as well as possible
relations with other female members of the staff over the years, and seemed
bound and determine to eliminate potential competition in the future.
The boss seems to have sensed that our former employee’s
moves to trickle up may well have been a threat to become a boss in the future
since there are too few power positions in our office in the first place.
Management may well have had good reason for firing one of
the female reporters (not a good writer etc.), her staunch stand against older
men hitting on her may well have worked against her in an atmosphere where
women are supposed to be compliant.
She either missed or ignored signals that might have allowed
her to save her job since far less competent workers – some who got high or
drunk on the job – retained their employment when this poor woman could not.
Our office has a long
history of such abuses going back to the previous owner, who apparently allowed
such hanky-panky to go on, and may well have used his position running
affordable housing as a platform for his own.
The boss seemed particularly aware of the favors our poet
friend seemed to get from the owner, and the potential for eventual advancement
that might eventually push our boss out of her corner office.
The boss seemed to catch onto something during the issue
with the pipe line photos. Although at that time, she had already hired a male writer
to replace our poet, she was poised to hire other writers, and seemed
determined to hire males.
This must have frustrated our male owner, who appears to
have used his position of power to get a little something on the side.
This owner is not stupid. If he is involved with some of his
female employees, he would make certain he got the right signal from them
before he made any advance.
The firing of our one female writer may have come because
she gave exactly the wrong signal, and part of the reason I volunteered to pick
up part of her beat was due to my admiration for her personal ethics. She might
be playing in a boy’s game, but she doesn’t have to be a victim.
The sudden shift to all male writers may well spoil the
owner’s game a bit – at least in the short term.
Comments
Post a Comment