What does it all really mean? May 7, 2013
Despite her poem about the scribe, she posted a few days
ago, she doesn’t have to post things on the web to leave her mark or show that
for some reason she is still concerned about what I day or write.
GA – that outrageous blogger from hometown – alerted me to
tracking who visits my website, even when they sometimes use VPN disguise
technology, and her fingerprints have been all over my website recently – and I’m
not completely sure as to why.
She has been looking most closely at those things I posted
last year – some of which I even regret getting passed by cyber nanny, each
pointing to a particularly painful moment.
No doubt, she is weighing her options as both her public
life and private lift appear to have erupted into a series of apparently insurmountable
obstacles – her bread and butter at work at risk due to the legal difficulties
while at home she can’t be with the man she loves, a relationship that has somehow
spilled over into the political. She seems to seek to restore order out of chaos
and may not feel as connected personally or politically as she once was.
Why she would waste her time wandering through the smoldering
landscape of my old poems remains a mystery – only partially answered by
yesterday’s post which I believe is aimed at me.
Those hits on my website, however, do not give me any clue
as to her actual thinking, only perhaps that she is lost and seeking answers,
when in fact she wastes a Friday night pondering the past when she should be
out and about club-hopping – sad testimony as to how lost she must really feel.
I have no clue to the actual dynamics, of who betrayed whom
or what reason, except in the clues she has provided in her poems – the most
mysterious of which referred to politics as well as love.
Has she been pushed out by the principle players?
I doubt she would allow that to happen considering her skill
at being about to trade up at need, getting a new protector to keep her from
harm.
But I suspect the failed romance and her ex-lover’s political
stance may have unnerved her a little.
For as much as I have painted her as capable of playing the
odds, I also truly believe she starts out each role as a true believer, more or
less sincerely believing what she says – maybe even a little naive which allows
her to be manipulated at first by players with no sense of ethics at all.
As that poem circa 2003 pointed out, she may have seen privileged
people as arrogant, the ones who get into clubs ahead of everybody else, but
she can get used to be one of them, and no doubt likes the idea of being on the
inside.
Only maybe even she didn’t realize at first how there is no team
players in games like this, only every man for him or herself.
Comments
Post a Comment