A girl has to feed June 13, 2013
As pointed out in a previous journal, I did not pay close
attention to her poetry early on. Otherwise, I might have been more careful,
and might have had a better understanding of what she is about, and her agenda.
And if I am reading one of her early poems from late April
2012 correctly, she appears to have been warning me (and other people) about
who she really is and what she is really after.
She paints herself as a hummingbird (something of a musical
connotation), who lands to get nourishment, then quickly moves on “Fast, long
and hard” taking refuge with someone else.
This landing, feeding and taking off again has become her
reality.
Nothing is permanent, or for that matter meant to be mean.
This is simply who she is and what she does, and how she
survives.
She “flits” in and out of other people’s vision, and for a
time, some are mesmerized by her, searching for some deeper meaning before she
moves on from them.
While those whose lives she touches want to know why, there
is no real answer except that this is simply her nature, no other reason, it is
what she is and what she must do.
This poem may or may not have been aimed at me. It comes at
a time when I raised those kinds of questions after she said certain things to
me, and at a time when she clearly was making her move to leave me and attend
to our temporary boss. And, of course, raised the question how she could leap
from one flower to another so frivolously.
While not as blatant a statement as she made in the trickle
and fair/unfair poems, the message – in hindsight – is clear.
One cannot question what she does because it is not a matter
of reason or logic it is simply fundamental to who and what she is there is no
deeper meaning and had I been wiser when I first saw the poem much of what
transpired a short time after she posted it might have been avoided
perhaps she suspected I already knew she was moving on to
our temporary boss and needed to make it clear this was not a criticism of me
so much as her need for substance I could not provide for her.
The use of Hummingbird as a metaphor sums up much since it
is a tiny often defenseless creature who relies on its cunning quickness and its
invisibility to survive.
In later poems she would call herself an accidental thief
and continue this theme of temporary relationships that other people take more
seriously than she does but this poem sets up the foundation of the rest
pointing out this behavior is not intentional so much as instinctual and she asks
her critics what else can she do since this is in her nature.
One poem posted last September summed up her life as to how
many times she fell in love. This poem suggests love is not her goal and it is impossible
to pin her down since nature requires her to behave this way, getting what she
needs from this person before moving on to the next.
This is her life to visit than to leave to taste the honey
of this or that temporary relationship then on to the next always on the move
always looking for the next person or situation knowing perhaps that no one
will satisfy all her needs and she seems determined not to let tied down to
anyone, calling those who want to possess her misguided.
The poem is constructed in two stanzas, the first describing
the habits of the hummingbird, the second ascribing those characteristics to
herself in her relationship to fellow human beings.
She makes it clear that this is what she does and what she will
likely always do, a friendly warning not to take disappointment personally, or
to try to find deep meaning in any of it. One does not question a sunflower or
a bumble bee. These things exist, they have their own qualities and habits, what
allows them to thrive. There is no great lesson of life to be learned, although
it might be pleasant in the short term to be the flower she leans on and enjoy
that temporary union while it lasts.
Comments
Post a Comment